Watch the Video

The text of Measure 11 – more than 2,400 words - is included below. Our opponents call the abortion ban “reasonable”, but as you read the language, you will realize it is complicated and would have dangerous consequences. Click on the highlighted portions of the text to learn about just some of the problems with the abortion ban.

Read the Initiative

Initiated Measure 11 has many flaws and would take away the most personal decisions women and families can make.

This summary attempts to clarify only some of the impact this dangerous law would have on the people of South Dakota. Opponents have stated openly that Initiated Measure 11 is merely a starting point and that the narrow and dangerous “exceptions” in this law will be removed at a later date.

The decision to have an abortion is profoundly difficult for a woman and her family. This complex, personal decision should be between a woman, her family, God and her doctor. No woman makes this decision without intense soul-searching and consultation with family and trusted loved ones.

Abortion is already rare in South Dakota and only performed after carefully considering all options. But this law will put the ultimate decision in the hands of the government in virtually every instance. Families need to be making these complex decisions, not politicians and lawyers.

Banning abortion has serious consequences and the bottom line is that Measure 11 is, in it’s entirety, a poorly crafted law.

Below are just a few of the most glaring and troublesome portions of Initiated Measure 11.

READ THE FINE PRINT.

Initiated Measure 11

Title: An Initiative to prohibit abortions except in cases where the mother’s life or health is at a substantial and irreversible risk, and in cases of reported rape and incest.

Full Text of Initiated Measure 11:

Section 1. That chapter 22-17 be amended by adding thereto a NEW SECTION to read as follows:

The people of the State of South Dakota find:

(1) That all induced abortions, whether surgically or chemically induced, terminate the life of an entire, unique, living human being, a human being separate from his or her mother, as a matter of scientific and biological fact;

(2) That the State of South Dakota possesses a duty to protect the life of all human beings within the state, and it is a legitimate exercise of the state’s power to protect the life of all human beings within the state, including those human beings living in utero;

(3) That submitting to an abortion subjects the pregnant woman to significant psychological and physical health risks, and that in the majority of cases there is neither the typical physician-patient relationship nor sufficient counseling between a pregnant woman contemplating submitting to an abortion and the physician who performs the abortion;

(4) That a pregnant woman possesses certain intrinsic rights which enjoy affirmative protection under the Constitution of the United States, and under the Constitution and laws of the State of South Dakota, and that among these rights are the fundamental right of the pregnant woman to her relationship with her child, and her fundamental right to make decisions that advance the well-being and welfare of her child;

(5) The state has a right and duty to protect the life of the unborn child, and to protect the life, health, and well-being of any pregnant woman within its jurisdiction, and it is therefore necessary to reasonably balance these interests to allow abortions only in certain circumstances which are set forth within this Act;

(6) That the state has an established history of working to protect the life of the unborn child, and the life, health, and well-being of pregnant women within its jurisdiction.

Section 2. That chapter 22-17 be amended by adding thereto a NEW SECTION to read as follows:

Except as permitted by section 3, 4, 5, or 6 of this Act, any person who knowingly performs any procedure upon a pregnant woman, or uses any instrument upon a pregnant woman, or administers any medicine or drug or substance or device to a pregnant woman, or prescribes or procures or sells any medicine or drug or substance or device for use by a pregnant woman, or employs any other means, with the intent of causing the termination of the life of an unborn human being, is guilty of performing an illegal abortion, which is a Class 4 felony.

This means that doctors accused of providing abortion to women in South Dakota, even if abortion is the best medical option for the patient, would be committing a Class 4 Felony, punishable by up to 10 years in prison and a fine of up to $20,000.

Section 3. Life of the Pregnant Woman Exception. That chapter 22-17 be amended by adding thereto a NEW SECTION to read as follows:

No person may be prosecuted under section 2 of this Act if a licensed physician has made a judgment that an abortion is necessary to avert the death of the pregnant woman, unless in reaching that judgment the physician knowingly disregards accepted standards of medical practice. The basis of that judgment shall be specifically identified and documented in the woman’s medical records.

Section 4. Health of the Pregnant Woman Exception. That chapter 22-17 be amended by adding thereto a NEW SECTION to read as follows:

No person may be prosecuted under section 2 of this Act if a licensed physician has made a judgment that an abortion is necessary because there is a serious risk of a substantial and irreversible impairment of the functioning of a major bodily organ or system of the pregnant woman should the pregnancy be continued and which risk could be prevented through an abortion, unless in reaching that judgment the physician knowingly disregards accepted standards of medical practice. The basis of that judgment shall be specifically identified and documented in the woman’s medical records.

Section 8. Reporting and Counseling Requirements. That chapter 22-17 be amended by adding thereto a NEW SECTION to read as follows:

Before performing an abortion pursuant to section 5 or 6 of this Act, the physician shall meet the following requirements:

(1) Advise the woman that a report of the rape or incest must be made, and prior to performing the abortion shall report the rape or incest immediately by telephone or otherwise to the state’s attorney or law enforcement of the county in which the rape or incest occurred, or, if the location is unknown, to the state’s attorney or law enforcement of the county in which the report is made to the physician. The report shall include the name, address, and date of birth of the woman, and, to the best of the woman’s ability, the date or dates of the reported rape or incest, the location where it occurred, and either the name and address of the perpetrator, if known, or, if not known, a description of the perpetrator and, in the case of incest, a description of the relationship between the pregnant woman and the perpetrator;

(2) Obtain the woman’s consent to collect a buccal or other biological sample from the woman, and a tissue sample from the remains of the embryo or fetus, each sufficient to perform forensic DNA analysis. The physician shall collect, secure, clearly label, and refrigerate the samples, and within twenty-four hours arrange with law enforcement to transfer custody of the samples;

(3) Provide the woman with the phone numbers and addresses of counseling services qualified in counseling victims of rape and incest in the area of her residence and also in the area in which the procedure is performed;

(4) Document all the actions taken pursuant to this section and maintain copies of all the documents and consents as part of the woman’s permanent medical records.

Nothing in this section limits a physician’s duty to report any information required by any other provision of South Dakota law.

Section 9. That chapter 22-17 be amended by adding thereto a NEW SECTION to read as follows:

Each facility that performs abortions shall have a written policy on reporting rape and incest.

Section 10. That chapter 22-17 be amended by adding thereto a NEW SECTION to read as follows:

The Department of Health shall publish, within one hundred eighty days after the effective date of this Act, forms to aid physicians in the accurate collection and reporting of information pursuant to this Act. The forms shall include the text of 22-22-1, 25-1-6, and the definition of incest in section 14 of this Act, and such other information as the department shall conclude is necessary or helpful and appropriate to aid physicians. The department shall also provide, upon request, materials necessary to collect and preserve the biological samples required by this Act.

Section 11.That chapter 22-17 be amended by adding thereto a NEW SECTION to read as follows:

Nothing in section 2 of this Act prohibits the prescription, sale, use, or administration of a contraceptive medicine, drug, substance or device, if prescribed, sold, used, or administered prior to the time when it could be determined that the woman is pregnant through conventional medical testing, and if the contraceptive measure is prescribed or sold in accordance with manufacturer instructions.

Nothing in section 2 of this Act prohibits any person from assisting a pregnant woman in obtaining an abortion in any other state where such procedure is legal.

Section 12. That chapter 22-17 be amended by adding thereto a NEW SECTION to read as follows:

Whenever a physician is performing an abortion permitted by section 3 or 4 of this Act, the physician shall make reasonable medical efforts under the circumstances to preserve both the life of the pregnant woman and the life of her unborn child in a manner consistent with accepted standards of medical practice. Any physician, who knowingly disregards accepted standards of medical practice in failing to make such efforts, is subject to a Class 4 felony.

Section 13. That chapter 22-17 be amended by adding thereto a NEW SECTION to read as follows:

Medical treatment provided to the pregnant woman by a licensed physician that results in the accidental or unintentional injury or death of the unborn child is not a violation of this Act.

Nothing in this Act subjects the pregnant woman upon whom any abortion is performed or attempted to any criminal conviction and penalty for an unlawful abortion.

No good faith report of rape or incest made under this Act may provide the basis for any criminal prosecution against the woman making such a report.

No woman making a report of incest who is eligible to obtain a legal abortion under section 6 of this Act may be prosecuted for the sexual conduct resulting in the pregnancy.

Section 14. That chapter 22-17 be amended by adding thereto a NEW SECTION to read as follows:

Terms used in this Act mean:

(1) “Pregnant,” the human female reproductive condition of having a living unborn child within the pregnant woman’s body, throughout the entire embryonic and fetal ages of the unborn child from fertilization to full gestation and child birth;

(2) “Unborn human being” and “unborn child,” an individual living member of the species homo sapiens throughout the entire embryonic and fetal ages from fertilization to full gestation and childbirth;

(3) “Incest,” an act of sexual penetration, as defined in 22-22-2, in which the woman was less than eighteen years of age at the time of sexual penetration and in which:

(a) The male performing the sexual penetration was related to the woman within the degrees of consanguinity within which marriages are, by the laws of this state, declared void pursuant to 25-1-6, or

(b) The woman was the child of the spouse or former spouse of the male performing the sexual penetration.

Section 15. That chapter 22-17 be amended by adding thereto a NEW SECTION to read as follows:

Chapters 187 and 188 of the 2005 Session Laws shall take effect pursuant to section 7 of chapter 187, as amended by section 1 of chapter 188, only in the event that the provisions of section 2 of this Act are declared unconstitutional or its enforcement is temporarily or permanently restrained or enjoined by judicial order.

Section 16. That chapter 22-17 be amended by adding thereto a NEW SECTION to read as follows:

Nothing in the provisions of chapters 22-17 and 34-23A permit any action that is prohibited by this Act. To the extent that any provision of chapters 22-17 and 34-23A might be so construed, the provisions of this Act take precedence.

Section 17. That chapter 22-17 be amended by adding thereto a NEW SECTION to read as follows:

Nothing in this Act authorizes a physician to perform an abortion unless the physician complies with all other applicable provisions of law, including the applicable provisions of chapter 34-23A.

Section 18. That chapter 34-23A be amended by adding thereto a NEW SECTION to read as follows:

Any physician who performs an abortion pursuant to section 3, 4, 5, or 6 of this Act shall submit a written statement to the Department of Health setting forth the following information as it relates to each abortion performed by the physician:

(1) The section of this Act pursuant to which the abortion was performed;

(2) All of the facts and circumstances upon which the physician relied in complying with all of the requirements and conditions of that section.

The written statement shall be submitted to the Department of Health at the end of each quarter of the year in which any abortion was performed by the physician. No statement made pursuant to this section may include the name of any pregnant woman having an abortion, but the physician shall provide a copy of the patient’s records with the patient’s names redacted, if requested by the Department of Health in writing.

Section 19. That chapter 22-17 be amended by adding thereto a NEW SECTION to read as follows:

Nothing in this Act repeals, by implication or otherwise, any provision not explicitly repealed.

Section 20. That chapter 22-17 be amended by adding thereto a NEW SECTION to read as follows:

If any provision of this Act is found to be unconstitutional or its enforcement temporarily or permanently restrained or enjoined by judicial order, the provision is severable; and the other provisions of this Act remain effective, except as provided in other sections of this Act.

Section 21. That chapter 22-17 be amended by adding thereto a NEW SECTION to read as follows:

This Act shall be known, and may be cited, as An Act to Protect the Lives of Unborn Children, and the Interests and Health of Pregnant Mothers, by Prohibiting Abortions Except in Cases Where the Mother’s Life or Health is at Risk, and in Cases of Rape and Incest.

The abortion ban DOES NOT have an exception for cases of fatal fetal anomalies. If the ban passes, a woman would be forced to carry a pregnancy to term even if the fetus had no chance of surviving after delivery. One example is anencephaly – a condition where the fetus develops without a brain or the brain develops outside the skull.
The inclusion of a health “exception” and “exceptions” for rape and incest is disingenuous and should be taken with a grain of salt. One of the ban’s primary national supporters, a New Jersey trial lawyer named Harold Cassidy, admitted in an internal strategy memo that the health exception is intended to be in place only temporarily. Once the ban is passed, the proponents hope to “establish that no health exception is needed.” He also argued that an examination of “the need for such [rape and incest] exception[s] should be put off to a time after Roe v Wade is overturned,” plainly indicating the intent to remove the “exceptions” at a later date.
This is another example of a false exception. What this would really do is put the lives of pregnant women in jeopardy and cause doctors to second guess their best medical judgment. Lawyers, not women, families and doctors, would make these serious medical decisions While it appears to permit doctors to exercise their medical judgment in the event that a pregnant woman faces life-threatening complications, the law is based on the doctor’s judgment being within “accepted standards of medical practice,” a standard that is completely undefined and unknowable. At the moment when the pregnant woman’s health has deteriorated to the point where, in her doctor’s judgment an abortion is necessary to avert her death, the doctor must stop to consider whether he might later be accused of having acted outside someone else’s view of the “accepted standards of medical practice,” thereby putting himself at risk of a felony conviction. Doctors will no longer be permitted to exercise their best medical judgment even to save the lives of pregnant women.

The so-called “health exception” to the abortion ban is far narrower than it appears. First, the criteria for qualifying for the “exception” --- “serious risk of a substantial and irreversible impairment to the functioning of a major bodily organ or system . . . [which] could be prevented through an abortion” – has no commonly understood meaning.

It does not give doctors fair warning about which health-preserving abortions are legal and which will place them at risk of criminal prosecution. As a result, doctors are likely to avoid performing medically necessary abortions for fear of being second-guessed about whether the woman’s condition falls within the vague and unclear language of Initiated Measure 11.

Some very serious health risks are not covered by this language. For example, a pregnant woman suffering from low grade chronic heart failure, involving severe restriction in her heart function, may not qualify for the “exception” even though her condition is very dangerous, because it is a temporary impairment and may not qualify as an “irreversible impairment.” Likewise some serious medical conditions may not qualify because the woman’s risk would be reduced, but not “prevented,” by an abortion.

To qualify for the rape or incest “exception”, doctors must be able to collect a tissue sample after the abortion. It is doubtful that this could be accomplished if the woman chooses to have a medication abortion (RU 486) in which the pregnancy ends, like a miscarriage, at home. Women who are ending a pregnancy caused by rape or incest may not be able to choose a medication abortion, even though for many women this is a far preferable method as it can be accessed in the very early weeks of pregnancy.
Section 11 seeks to assure those deciding this matter that it is not intended to restrict access to birth control. While Leslee Unruh and other backers of this ban have made clear their opposition to birth control in the past, we will leave it to you to decide whether or not this measure restricts birth control. At a minimum this provision places pharmacists at risk if they fill prescriptions for contraception without knowing for certain that the woman is not already pregnant. This could mean that women will be forced to take pregnancy tests before they can get a prescription for birth control pills filled.
This section adds additional restrictions on doctors who perform abortions in order to save the woman’s life or protect her health. It fails to adequately protect women dealing with medically complicated pregnancies. It requires doctors to try to save both the woman’s life and the baby’s life – even if the fetus cannot survive, and even if the steps taken to save the fetus put the woman at risk. Section 12 is based on the doctor using “reasonable medical efforts” that are “consistent with accepted standards of medical care,” The initiative provides no guidance about what these vague terms mean. A doctor who is trying to save the life of a pregnant patient by performing an abortion must worry that he will later be second-guessed and prosecuted about whether he tried hard enough to save the fetus, even in circumstances where continuing the pregnancy puts the woman at risk and even when the fetus has no chance of survival.

Section 18 does nothing to protect the privacy of women and families. Upon demand of the Department of Health, doctors would have to turn over patients’ records to the government with only a patient’s name redacted – other identifying information, like addresses, social security numbers and birth dates, would remain intact and become public.

The government would maintain records of womens' circumstances, procedures and any related characteristics which may be used by attorneys, government agents or other people obtaining the records, to identify the woman who obtained an abortion for any reason whatsoever.

Read the Facts

South Dakota has one of the lowest abortion rates in the country and abortions performed in South Dakota represent just 0.1% of all abortions in the United States.

http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/sfaa/south_dakota.html

Guttmacher Institute, 8/11/08

South Dakota’s regulations on abortion are the most burdensome in the country. Before an abortion is performed, the following requirements must be met:

The woman must receive state-mandated “counseling.”

The woman must wait at least 24 hours after the state-mandated “counseling” before procedure may be provided.

If the patient is a minor, a parent or guardian of the patient must be notified.

The doctor must offer the woman an opportunity to view a sonogram, and must then record any responses in her permanent medical records.

The doctor must deliver a government-dictated script to women designed to intimidate her and discourage her decision. The mandatory language includes statements of fact which are contrary to all available medical research.

http://legis.state.sd.us/statutes/DisplayStatute.aspx?

SD Codified Law, 8/11/08